Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Chassiakos, A P and Sakellaropoulos, S P (2005) Time-Cost Optimization of Construction Projects with Generalized Activity Constraints. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1115–24.

Eldin, N N and Mayfield, J (2005) Determination of Most Economical Scrapers Fleet. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1109–14.

Kale, S and Arditi, D (2005) Diffusion of Computer Aided Design Technology in Architectural Design Practice. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1135–41.

Kumaraswamy, M M, Ling, F Y, Rahman, M M and Phng, S T (2005) Constructing Relationally Integrated Teams. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1076–86.

Kumaraswamy, M M, Rahman, M M, Ling, F Y and Phng, S T (2005) Reconstructing Cultures for Relational Contracting. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1065–75.

Mbabazi, A, Hegazy, T and Saccomanno, F (2005) Modified But-For Method for Delay Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1142–4.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Delay time; Claims; Computer applications; Construction management;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1142)
  • Abstract:
    “But-for” is a widely used method for analyzing and apportioning project delays among the responsible parties. Despite its acceptability, the traditional but-for method suffers from serious drawbacks; namely its narrow focus on the point of view of a single party and its inability to accurately consider concurrent delays. In this technical note, several improvements have been made to the but-for method to produce repeatable results and to account for concurrent delays. Details of the modified but-for (MBF) method are provided along with an example to demonstrate its advantages. To automate the MBF method, it has been coded in a macro program on commercial project management software. The method is simple and can help practitioners in apportioning project delays in an accurate and equitable manner.

Mohamed, Y and AbouRizk, S (2005) Application of the Theory of Inventive Problem Solving in Tunnel Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1099–108.

Rahman, M M and Kumaraswamy, M M (2005) Relational Selection for Collaborative Working Arrangements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1087–98.

Weinstein, M, Gambatese, J and Hecker, S (2005) Can Design Improve Construction Safety?: Assessing the Impact of a Collaborative Safety-in-Design Process. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1125–34.

Wong, P S, Cheung, S O and Ho, P K (2005) Contractor as Trust Initiator in Construction Partnering—Prisoner’s Dilemma Perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1045–53.

Zhang, X (2005) Concessionaire’s Financial Capability in Developing Build-Operate-Transfer Type Infrastructure Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(10), 1054–64.